How can the event of the sun standing still for a day in Joshua 10:12-14 be explained scientifically/theologically?
In Joshua 10:12-14 we are told that during a battle, the sun stood still midday or about 12:00 p.m. in order to help the nation of Israel completely defeat the armies of five Amorite kings (Joshua 10:5-11). The battle is described in verses 7-10. In verse 11 we discover that the invading armies fled. It could have been in the winter since verse 11 says that God rained hailstones down from heaven on the invading army. As a result, many died. Then in verses 12-13 we are told that Joshua spoke to God first and then to the nation of Israel. God stopped the sun when Joshua publicly commanded that the sun stop.
Miracle of Hailstones
There are two obvious miracles here. The first miracle that occurred is the hailstorm that killed many soldiers in the invading armies in verse 11.
As they fled from before Israel, while they were at the descent of Beth-horon, the Lord threw large stones from heaven on them as far as Azekah, and they died; there were more who died from the hailstones than those whom the sons of Israel killed with the sword. Joshua 10:11 (NASB)
While most hailstorms contain small frozen chunks of water, these hailstones must have been very large. A miracle occurred that afternoon when these hailstones fell from the sky. But the miracle was not the size of the hailstones that killed many in the armies because very large hailstones do occur. In recent years, fist size hailstones have destroyed homes, cars, windows, and have killed people. The Telegraph documented probably the most significant hailstorm when it reported that 200 people in the Himalayas were killed by giant hailstones. The miracle that occurred for Joshua was that God commanded the hailstones to drop unexpectedly. This event also suggests that the sky contained clouds.
Miracle of Stationary Sun and Moon
The second miracle occurred when the sun stood still. The passage states that Joshua commanded the sun to stop. Here is the passage,
Then Joshua spoke to the Lord in the day when the Lord delivered up the Amorites before the sons of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel,
“O sun, stand still at Gibeon,
And O moon in the valley of Aijalon.”
So the sun stood still, and the moon stopped,
Until the nation avenged themselves of their enemies.
Is it not written in the book of Jashar? And the sun stopped in the middle of the sky and did not hasten to go down for about a whole day. There was no day like that before it or after it, when the Lord listened to the voice of a man; for the Lord fought for Israel. Joshua 10:12-14 (NASB)
What happened? As one would expect, there are a number of views that have been proposed to explain how this event occurred.
View #1 – Figurative Language Was Used
One view about what occurred claims that Joshua 10:12-14 used figurative language and described only what Joshua and the Israelites imagined. Supposedly, Joshua was too tired. The day seemed long and in his excitement, he wrote poetically. It only seemed like the sun stood still to Joshua because the day was so long. 
This view is rejected for two reasons. First, there is a better explanation which will be presented later. The second reason for rejecting this view is that such a view has a low view of the Bible, since God wrote it by His Holy Spirit. It is a low view since God does not lie. Since He wrote the Bible, the words are true.
. . . God is not a man, that He should lie . . . Numbers 23:19 (NASB)
. . . God, who cannot lie . . . Titus 1:2 (NASB)
The conclusion is: this is not figurative language.
View #2 – An Eclipse Occurred
Another view is that Joshua was describing an eclipse. This view was held by Robert Dick Wilson (1856-1930). He based his view on the fact that the Hebrew word damam that is translated as “stood still” can mean “silent.” It is important to note that the Hebrew word damam can also mean “rest, wait, relax, quieted and motionless.” But “silent” is not the common translation. In the English Standard Bible (ESV), New American Standard Bible (NASB), King James Bible (KJV), New King James Version Bible (NKJV), and Holman Christian Standard Bible (HCSB) the Hebrew word is translated as “silent” less than one-third of the time. That is, the overwhelming view of many translators is that damam should not be translated as “silent.” Even if “silent” is the correct translation, this word does not provide strong support for the concept of a solar eclipse.
Wilson is not alone in his belief that Joshua’s long day was an eclipse of the sun. Boling promotes the eclipse of September 30, 1131 B.C. as the very eclipse. Eugene Faulstich has a different opinion. He prefers the eclipse of April 19, 1421 B.C. Unfortunately, that eclipse occurred more than 300 years after the event described in Joshua. The biblical date for the event is estimated to have occurred about 1400 B.C.[7, 8]. However, some date the event about 1200. The message is that aligning the dates of the eclipse to this historical event is uncertain.
Some claim that Joshua wanted to frighten his enemies and diminish the heat of the day by an eclipse. But that is not what Joshua 10:13 states. Joshua stated that he wanted to “avenge” or repay their enemies. Insofar as the heat of the day is concerned, any relief granted the Israelites would also be granted Israel’s enemies. More importantly, an eclipse is of a short duration, lasting at most eight minutes. NASA states,
This is about 7.5 minutes. The longest total solar eclipse from 4000 BCE to 8000 CE, a span of 12,000 years, will occur on July 16, 2186 and will last 7 minutes 29 seconds. Its path sweeps across Colombia, Venezuela and Guyana. The August 21, 2017 total solar eclipse, by comparison, will last a maximum of 2 minutes 43 seconds. About 70% of eclipses last longer than this.
Such a short duration would have minimal impact on an enemy. Further, it would not have provided very much time to defeat the enemy with darkness of evening approaching.
A natural occurring solar eclipse is not a good explanation for three reasons. First, astronomy cannot provide any solid supporting evidence of a solar eclipse in the time period of the event recorded in Joshua 10:13. The second reason a solar eclipse did not occur was that the Hebrew text does not support a solar eclipse. The sun and moon would not be aligned in order to create a solar eclipse. That is, Joshua 10:12 states that the sun was directly overhead and the moon off to the west. Marten H. Woudstra has made this comment,
The respective locations of the sun and moon at the time that Joshua addressed them are at Gibeon and at the valley of Aijalon. This means that as Joshua looked in the direction of the sun, he saw it standing in the sky over Gibeon. Likewise the moon could be seen standing over the valley of Aijalon which was west of Beth-horon.
The third reason that a solar eclipse will not explain Joshua 10:13 is that the verse implies the sun was visible.
View #3 – Hailstorm Continued One Day
Another view claims that Joshua actually prayed for the sun to not shine. That is, he prayed for darkness and the darkness was caused by the hailstorm which lasted for one day. This is the view of Claude Mariottini. He states,
It is true that God could stop the sun and still maintain the solar system in place. But the laws of physics bring serious doubts to the traditional interpretation of the text. The stopping in place of the sun and the moon would affect the whole solar system. In addition, there are other problems with this interpretation. 
Claude Mariottini claims that the laws of physics would have been violated if the sun stood still. He finds a solution by assuming that the sun was “silent” too! That is, the sun did not shine. Rather than the event occurring in the middle of the day, he proposes that the hailstorm or the “darkness” continued killing armies of the Amorites (Joshua 10:5, 13). Therefore, Joshua prayed for darkness or the hailstorm to continue. He claims,
This view also allows for a better understanding of the text without forcing upon it an interpretation that would require the reversal of the laws of physics.
But this view must be rejected for three reasons. The first reason is that a literal and plain reading of Joshua 10:11-12 suggests that the hailstorm stopped in verse 11 since we are given a summary that more Amorite soldiers died from the hailstorm than from the Israelites. The summary statement could not have been given in verse 11 if the storm had continued into verse 12-13. That means the storm did not continue after the “sun stood still.” That is, the darkness did not continue.
The second reason that this view must be rejected is that there is no solid textual evidence to support the idea that the sun and moon were “silent” or “dark.” Archer and Waltke state,
In I Sam 14:9 the concept of “waiting” or “standing still” appears. This seems to be the meaning when Joshua asks the Lord to make the sun “stand still” and the moon “stop” so he could pursue the Amorites (Josh 10:12–13). Those interpreters who explain this miracle in terms of the silencing of the sun’s heat have a more difficult time, especially in view of the parallelism with the moon.
Gleason Archer concurs by stating that the moon was in the west and the sun was in the east.
The final reason that this view must be rejected is that the author claims the law of physics would have been violated if the sun stood still. But such reasoning displays a low view of the Bible and our God. If God cannot lie and God is all powerful, then God can accomplish whatever He wants.
View #4 – The Sun Stood Still and The Moon Stopped
The final view that we will consider is a literal view that says the sun “stood still” and the moon “stopped.” That is, the message of Joshua 10:13,
So the sun stood still, and the moon stopped,
Until the nation avenged themselves of their enemies. Joshua 10:13 (NASB)
This view believes that the Bible is the very words of God and that is why 2 Timothy 2:15 calls the Bible the Word of Truth. The message is that the book of Joshua is truth and records what God did.
Genesis 1:1 clearly explains how the universe came into existence along with the laws of physics.
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. Genesis 1:1 (NASB)
Since He created everything in the beginning, we can be confident that He knows how to change or freeze the laws of physics and perform a miracle without destroying the universe or creating havoc. God can do whatever He wants to His creation. Revelation 19:6 reminds us that He is all powerful.
Then I heard something like the voice of a great multitude and like the sound of many waters and like the sound of mighty peals of thunder, saying, “Hallelujah! For the Lord our God, the Almighty, reigns. Revelation 19:6 (NASB)
Job 38-39 reveals that God knows the details of His creation. He put the laws of physics in place. Colossians 1:17 states that He continues to hold the universe together. He continues to maintain the subatomic particles and the laws of the universe. He is the glue of the universe! We can be confident that God knows how to change the laws of the universe any time He desires without causing a disaster. He can do anything.
Evidence The Sun Stood Still
Consider the supporting evidence from Dave G. Becher that the event actually occurred. He writes the following,
Various native North American Indian Tribes have tales of a long night, as detailed in 1914 by Olcott, regarding the Ojibway, Wyandot, Dogrib, Omaha and Bungee Indians.
There is a tale of a long night from Quiche Mayans of Gutemala, as well as an account from Peru during the reign of Titu Yupanqui Pachacuti II (who ruled at the same time that Joshua was in Canaan).
“The Greek historian Herodotus . . . wrote that when he visited Egypt, the priests there showed him an ancient manuscript which told the story of a day which lasted about twice as long as a normal day.” Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics also tell a story of Joshua’s long day, according to Fernand Crombette.
According to Gill’s Commentary, there is a Chinese account from an ancient manuscript now lost, that recounted a period of time during the reign of Emperor Yau (concurrent with Joshua’s account), when the sun stood still for ten days, (which is quite possibly an overestimate, subjective guess as to the actual amount of time, since all their sun clocks halted). J. G. Frazer recounts a story from the Fiji Islands, in which the sun stopped from setting. 
Since God is all-powerful, we conclude that He can stop the sun and moon, freeze the laws of physics and still maintain the universe. Any other view is a very low, illogical and dishonoring view of an all-powerful, omniscient, self-existing God. He does not need our help to explain away a divine miracle with a humanistic and rationalistic explanation.
Joshua 10:12-14 describes a miracle performed by the God of miracles.
1. “Mamma mia! Naples hammered with fist-sized hailstones.” RT.com; “8 Deadliest Hail Storms in History.” NewsMax.
2. “Giant hail killed more than 200 in Himalayas.” The Telegraph (telegraph.co.uk).
3. J Carl Laney. Answers to Tough Questions. Kregel. 1997. pp. 60-61.
4. “Joshua’s Long Day.” Enoch Calendars (gocentricity.com).
5. Tom Slattery. The Tragic End of the Bronze Age: A Virus Makes History. iUniverse. 2001.
6. Dave G. Becher. The Tripartite Helmet of Hope and Salvation: The Omniscience, Omnipotence. WestBow Press. 2016. Location 7144.
7. James Usher. The Annals of the World. Master Books. 2004. p.51.
8. Walvoord & Zuck. The Bible Knowledge Commentary. ChariotVictor Publishing. 1985. p. 326.
9. R. K. Harrison. Old Testament Times. Hendrickson Publishing. 2001. p. 177.
10. Marten H. Woudstra. The Book of Joshua. Eerdmans Publishing Co. 1981. 175-176.
11. NASA (eclipse2017.nasa.gov/how-long-does-longest-possible-total-solar-eclipse-last)
12. “Rereading Joshua 10:12-13: The Long Day of Joshua.” Claude Mariottini (claudemariottini.com).
14. Harris, R. L., Archer, G. L., Jr., and Waltke, B. K. (Eds.). (1999). Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (electronic ed., p. 193). Chicago: Moody Press.
15. Gleason Archer. Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties. Zondervan. 1982. P. 162.
16. Becher. Ibid, pp. 7122-7144.
Reference Links:Can We Trust the Bible, part 1?
Can We Trust the Bible, part 2?
Is The Bible Complete and Inerrant?
Can you explain the apparent contradiction of Deut. 28:63 and Ezek. 18:23?