 re
you a thoughtless, uneducated and easy to control Christian? If you are
a Christian, there are some who think that you just need to leave your
church and read a good book by an atheist to have your thinking corrected.
In 1993, the nationally known Washington Post writer Michael Weisskopf
expressed the opinion that evangelical Christians were “largely
poor, uneducated, and easy to command . . .” [1] Unfortunately,
he was not alone in his opinion. Yet his comment was like an exploding
bomb. Even now one can surf the internet and find similar statements
from others. One atheist’s web site blatantly calls Christians
uneducated and idealists. Another claims that Christians are biased in
their belief about God.
A recent article in the USA Today newspaper reported that
there is a wave of new books which suggests that atheism is on the increase:
Atheist Manifesto: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam;
The Quotable Atheist; Letter To A Christian Nation; God: The Failed Hypothesis;
How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist; and The God Delusion, which
is a New York Times best-seller. [2] These
new books reflect a trend and the result of a growing rejection of the
Christian faith.
Christians are told by unbelieving critics that science
has proven that God does not exist, even while the critic ignores the
fact that theories
of science are constantly changing because they are in error. Recently
the Hubble Telescope proved a major scientific theory to be wrong. After
being launched into space, the satellite transmitted data down to earth
that indicates the expansion of the universe is not slowing down as earlier
suggested by the big bang theory. In fact, the expansion of the universe
is increasing in speed. [3] One
well-known scientist made this comment,
Few theoretical estimates in the history of physics made
on the basis of what seemed reasonable assumptions have ever been so
inaccurate. [4]
History has demonstrated that science is not perfect! It is an art form
of trial and error whose formulas and hypotheses are dynamic. How then
does one test for God? Do we need an armada of satellites to search for
God? Should Christians change their beliefs to please their culture?
Or, phrased another way, should Christians ignore the teachings of the
Bible because others reject it? Should Christians reject its prophecies,
the archaeological findings, the historical writings of secular and Jewish
authors and the recorded statements of the Bible in the four gospels
about Jesus?
How About These Tests? How many Christians
and non-Christians know that the
Jewish writings accused Jesus of performing miracles by sorcery or
demonic powers, [5] stated
that He was hanged or crucified on a cross, [6] that
He died at the age of 33 or 34, [7] and
claimed that His body was stolen from the grave and dragged through the
streets of Jerusalem? [8]
The gospels directly and honestly state that Jesus was
accused by the religious leaders of performing His miracles by the power
of Satan (Matt. 12:22-32). The explanations and accusations of the leaders
are not hidden from those who read the gospels. They are presented for
everyone to read. The gospels are honest and forthcoming, recording historical
accounts about Jesus Christ. The gospels also reveal that Jesus was about
33 or 34 years old when He died (Luke 3:23 plus three or four years for
His ministry) and that the Jewish leaders claimed His body was stolen
(Matt. 28:11-15). It is important to notice that the written records
of the Jewish leaders admit that Jesus performed miracles and wonders,
and that His body did not remain in the grave.
They could not explain His miracles or wonders, except
to claim that His miracles were performed through demonic power. They
could not explain how He returned to life, except to claim that His body
was stolen. The Babylonian Talmud and other documents actually admit
that these things occurred, but they did not want to conclude that He
was God.
Is it possible the religious leaders told the truth about
Jesus? If so, why do the records of the secular historians disagree with
the Babylonian Talmud? Is it possible that the gospel records are correct
when they state that the religious leaders hated Jesus, rejected Jesus’ claim
to be God (John 10:33) and wanted to kill Him?
For this reason therefore the Jews were seeking all
the more to kill Him, because He not only was breaking the Sabbath, but
also was calling God His own Father, making Himself equal with God. (NASB)
John 5:18
At His coming the lame shall leap as an hart, and the
tongue of the stammerer shall be clear speaking: the blind shall see,
and the lepers shall be cleansed; and the dead shall rise, and walk about. [9]
Some claim that a forged document bearing the name of Pontius Pilate
was created in the third century. But the statement above was written
in the first century and quoted by Justin Martyr (A.D. 100-165).
Flavius
Josephus (A.D. 37-97) wrote that Jesus existed, was the Messiah
or Christ, performed “surprising feats,” was a teacher
of truth, died on a cross, and returned to life on the third day. [10] These
are significant statements about Jesus.
Why do references to Jesus Christ in the Dead Sea scrolls
support statements that can be found in the gospels? One Dead Sea scroll
refers to Jesus as “the son of God” and the one who was “pierced” and “wounded.” [11] The
negative accusations about Jesus can only be found in the Jewish records.
Yet, those records are priceless because they admit that Jesus performed
miracles and wonders and was not in the His grave three days after His
death.
We should also remember that many Old Testament prophecies
about Jesus came true. One amazing prophecy dating from 530 B.C. found
in Daniel 9:25-26 specifies the exact week in which the Messiah would
die. Jesus died in that week! A prophecy found in Isaiah, dating from
700 B.C., predicted that Jesus would perform miracles,
Then will the eyes of the blind be opened and ears of
the deaf unstopped. Then will the lame leap like a deer, and the mute
tongue shout for joy (NIV).” Isa. 35:5-6
How does one explain that the ancient critics, the impartial, and the
early Christians all agreed that these things happened? These are signs
from the hand of God.
Some Questions. Why are some eager to reject
the testimony of Flavius Josephus and Pontius Pilate but are unwilling
to accept the claims of the Jewish documents? They have missed the point
that the authors of the Jewish documents actually admit that Jesus existed,
did miracles, and that His death was unusual. They actually admit what
Pontius Pilate and Flavius Josephus record.
Why do some reject the ancient prophecies about Jesus,
yet ignore the fact that there is almost universal agreement among conservative
and liberal scholars that the ancient prophecy of Isaiah was written
around 700 B.C. Isaiah predicted that a forerunner, John the Baptist,
would come first (Isa. 40:3), God would come and perform miracles (Isa.
35:4-6), and would die for our sins (Isa. 53). These are only a few of
many prophecies from Isaiah.
Why do some claim that the Gnostics
were Christians who
had fresh insights about Jesus and yet reject the fact that the Gnostics
did not believe that Jesus was God? Consequently, such documents as the
Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Mary and the Gospel of Nicodemus, to name
a few, are unknowingly being accepted by some as Christian documents.
Why do some reject the fact that Jesus claimed to be God
but are willing to accept Him as a wise man and a great teacher? If Jesus
was not God, then He was a liar or mentally unbalanced.
How many Christians and non-Christians know that the historical
accounts of the gospels record that Jesus claimed to be God? Unfortunately,
some religious leaders do not understand the plain and simple words of
the gospels, or they want to change the meaning. For example, the founder
of the Jesus Seminar, Robert Funk, rejects the concept that Jesus was
God when he says,
Jesus himself is not the proper object of faith. This
proposition, I realize is a radical departure from the views. Jesus called
on his followers to trust the Father, to believe in God’s domain
or reign. The proper object of faith inspired by Jesus is to trust what
Jesus trusted . . . Jesus pointed to something he called God’s
domain, something that he did not create, something that he did not control
. . . Jesus himself should not be, must not be, the object of faith.
That would be to repeat the idolatry of the first believers.[12]
Yet, the gospels record a different account. Listen to how the Jewish
leaders answered Jesus on one occasion,
The Jews answered Him, “For a good work we do
not stone You, but for blasphemy; and because You, being a man, make
Yourself out to be God.” (NASB) John 10:33
The Jewish leaders understood that Jesus claimed to be God on several
occasions (Luke 5:21; John 5:18).
Conclusion. In summary, the testimony from
some secular writers and the Old Testament prophecies are positive and
only the records of the Jewish leaders are negative. We should remember
that Jewish records indirectly admit that Jesus performed miracles and
returned to life. They rejected Jesus’ claims to be God and consequently
invented an excuse for what they had witnessed.
Why are Christians accused of being biased and uneducated
because they believe Jesus is God? The truth is that those who reject
Jesus are like the religious leaders of Jesus’ day who found reasons
to not believe in Him too! The truth is that objectivity reveals that
Jesus was a historical person and the claims of the gospels are true.
It is wonderful that so many understand that Jesus’ enemies knew
that His life was unique, His ministry was extraordinary and His death
and return to life was abnormal. It is wonderful that they understand
that secular writers, the prophets of old, the Qumran writers and the
gospels all remind us that the only explanation for Jesus is that He
was God.
May the Lord bless you,
John Calahan
May 2007
PDF Download: Christians:
Are They Wrong? (89K, PDF)
Related Links:
References:
1. Michael Weisskopf. Washington
Post. 1993.
2. Don Feder. Atheism Isn’t
The Final Word. April 16, 2007.
3. Alex Williams. Dismantling
The Big Bang. Master Books. 2005. p. 111.
4. Larry Abbott, “The
Mystery of the Cosmological Constant. Scientific American, 258(50:82-88
(May 1988).
5. Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin
43a.
6. Ibid.
7. Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin
106a.
8. Paul L Maier, First Easter.
New Yor: Harper and Row, 1973. pp. 117-118.
9. Justin Martyr. First Apology
48
10. Flavius Josephus. Antiquities
of the Jews 18.3.3
11. G. R. Jeffrey. The Signature
of God. Frontier Research Publications. 1996. p. 99-100.
12. Robert Funk. Honest To
Jesus. HarperSanFrancisco. 1996. p. 304-305. |