Bible
Question:I am an atheist. I want you to prove to me that there
is a god in the world. I believe that science is god. So do not prove
that God exists from the Bible, because I know that Jesus said He
was god. Can you prove that for me?
Bible Answer: This week I read a surprising
article in Forbes ASAP. I would like to quote it at length for you and
then answer your question. Forbes Magazine is a non-Christian publication.
It's too easy, with the benefit of modernity,
hindsight, and all that, to regard science as the most fearless, objective,
apolitical, democratic, and open-minded of human endeavors - the seeker
of truth. Never mind anything by divine right . . .
Throughout the 16th century, as it gradually dawned on
everybody that Columbus hadn't, after all, hit some island off Japan
or India (where he was headed at the time) but that he had in fact come
across an entirely new continent, everything epistemological hit the
fan. For a comfortable 2,000 years, life, the universe, and everything
had been what Aristotle . . . said it would be . . So what was [America]
doing there?
Things got rapidly worse in the first decades of the 17th century,
as people like Galileo started seeing other centers of attraction, such as Jupiter circled by its
moons. To compound the felony, sailors started coming back across the Atlantic to Europe with hundreds
of new American animal and plant species that were not described in Aristotle's list . . .
In the desperate search for some way to bail out the sinking ship or
shut the stable door, a couple of quick thinkers came up with some solutions. One was a French engineer
named Rene Descartes who . . . suggested that the only way to find truth was to go on doubting until
you stripped away all dubious elements so as to arrive at a point where what remained was so self-evident
that it was beyond doubt. That would be truth.
The other guy, an English legal eagle by the name of Francis Bacon,
opted for correlation and analysis as a means of certainty. Amass enough evidence and you were halfway
there. His admirers then came up with a Royal Society for doing this stuff, with correspondents all
over the place sending in cards and letters filled with their observations. The Royal Society motto, "Take
Nobody's Word for It," generated a procedure for making sure other people were seeing what you
were seeing, known as "witnessing." If enough people agreed they were all witnessing the
same thing, then it was a "matter of fact."
In the late 19th century, at the University of Nancy, France, the recent
discovery of X-rays convinced people that other rays should be there too. Sure enough, once some
guy demonstrated N rays (named after the town), they became a hot ticket to a Ph.D. And, no doubt,
somebody got a degree, in N-ray studies. Then one day some American, who hadn't heard about these
rays, said the truth was he couldn't see them. Sure enough, when everybody looked closer, nor could
they. Collapse of theory.
This kind of collapse riddles the history of the so-called truth finding
sciences. Here's a list of the greatest hits of scientific theory collapse. For centuries it was
known that disease came from miasma, a foul air emanating from marshes and putrescent materials and
such creepy stuff . . . Until 1884, when Louis Pasteur discovered germs. For centuries electricity
was a fluid . . . until 1820. It was a well-known fact rotten apples spontaneously generated little
worms and grubs found inside them . . . until 1767. The atom was indivisible . . . until 1877 . .
. Light was particles until 1801, when it became waves; until 1905, when it became particles again;
until 1924, when it became both. And my all time favorite, the one that really makes my point: Space
and time were absolutes until 1886, when Ersnt Mach introduced the insidious concept of relativity
and set the stage for Einstein.
In the end, the can of worms Columbus opened with
his trip to India is this: There is no truth to find. Truth is what
you want it to be . . . (James Burke, Forbes ASAP, October 2, 2000).
While I disagree with the author's summary it is clear that he made
is point. The theories of science are constantly changing because
science is a constant search for truth. Science is an art form that
seeks truth. It is art form because scientists create hypothesizes,
test those hypothesizes, change the tests when the tests when prove
to be inadequate and discard the theories if they are wrong.
Science is not truth. It is only man's guess at the truth until something
proves it to be wrong.
We
Would Need To Be God! Neither science nor I can prove
that God exists. You cannot prove He does not exist. Neither
of us can prove He does or does not exist because we do not see
Him. In order to prove that, you or I would need to know every
part of the universe and everything about the universe because
God could be anywhere. We would also have to know everything
about the other dimensions of time and existence. In short, we
would need to be god to know everything and be everywhere at
the same time because God might move. Then we would be god if
we could know everything and be everywhere at
the same time. Science is inadequate for the task.
It cannot tell us how the stuff that caused the "big-bang" came
into existence or where it came from - how anything got started. That is a problem for science if
it really is the god of truth. Science cannot tell me why 4,000 or 2,000 year old prophecies in the
Bible came true. It cannot tell me how 700 - 500 year old prophecies came true predicting
the exact week in which Jesus would die. Or, why 1,000
year old prophecies were accurate about Jesus' birth, life and His death.
What Is Truth? Our experience is not
a measure of truth. Atheism says there is no god. Did science prove
that? If so, what is the name of the test for determining that god
does not exist? Our experience does not prove or disprove god. I
have heard men and women claim their god has done something wonderful
for them in their life. People are always using experience as proof
that god is real or their religion is correct. How do they know?
How can they be sure it was their god and not mine? My God may have
lovingly done them a favor! How do we determine truth? I started
my quest for truth by determining which sacred book could be validated
as truth. The Christian Bible passed the test
of fulfilled prophecy. Its has hundreds
of prophecies - they came true! This is the test of truth no other sacred book can match. When it
speaks, it speaks truth! It states that God is Jesus Christ.
Conclusion:Science is not fool proof! It is
constantly changing as one theory after another is being revised and
updated because we do not really know - we are learning. Evolution is
no exception. Science is only as good as the human mind and that is faulty,
biased and guilty of serious errors. May I suggest truth can be found
in a supernatural book - a sacred book - the Bible. It has been proven
to be accurate when it speaks to history and prophecy. It predicted Jesus'
birth and death, including the week in which He would die. It predicted
His return to life, and historical
records witness to the life, death and miracles of Jesus. Jesus is
God! God only asks us to believe
in Jesus!
Related Links:
|